Washington Is Funding Nursing-Home Nurses. Who Funds the Caregiver in Your Mother's Home?

By Vincent Cruz

On Friday, October 23, the administration announced "Nurses for Nursing Homes" — a $275 million initiative to recruit and retain nurses in nursing homes across the country. Nurses and nursing students who commit to three years at a qualifying facility can receive up to $40,000 in student-loan repayment and a $10,000 stipend. The money comes from penalties collected from nursing homes themselves, all 50 states are participating, and more than 4,000 nurses are expected to benefit.

It is real help, aimed at a real shortage. I work in senior care every day, and I am not going to pretend otherwise.

But it covers only half of senior care — the half that happens inside facilities. The other half happens where most seniors actually want to be: at home. And for that half, there is no initiative, no stipend, and no loan repayment. There is just a family, paying out of pocket.

What families actually pay

I am a live-in caregiver in Los Angeles. For six years I have lived in my clients' homes — present around the clock, sleeping under the same roof, there for the 2 a.m. fall and the morning medication. I also run Only Livein, a jobs board that collects live-in caregiver listings, and every month we publish the rates those listings actually offer.

Here is the ground truth from both sides of that work. At the top of the market, families pay $500 to $700 a day for an experienced live-in caregiver. My own rate is $500 a day, and families pay it without blinking, because the alternative is a facility their mother does not want to live in. Across the whole market, our Pay Index puts the median live-in rate at $245 a day, computed from current listings — real money by any family's standard, and every cent of it comes from the family. No program reimburses a dollar of it.

There is a reason the median sits so far below what families pay me directly. Most listings come through agencies, and the agency takes its cut in the middle: a family pays the agency a premium for round-the-clock care, while the caregiver in the home is offered far less. Look at what the agencies themselves advertise. In our feed right now, an agency in El Paso, Texas is offering $11 to $14 an hour for this work — a rate that would fall below the minimum wage in California, New York, and most other states that set their own — and spread across the 24 hours a live-in caregiver is on site, even the $245 median works out to roughly $10 an hour. The family's bill is high. The caregiver's pay is not. The difference is the middleman.

Care.com proved there is another way to run this: cut the agency out, and let the family employ the caregiver directly. The family pays less than the agency's price, and the caregiver keeps more of it — a win on both sides of the door. What that model never gave either side is the number to negotiate around. That is the problem I built Only Livein to solve: the most accurate pay data in live-in care — the median rate in every state, computed from real listings and updated monthly — so a family knows what care actually costs, and a caregiver knows what their work is actually worth, before either of them signs anything.

The workforce nobody is funding

The program's logic is sound: elder care has a staffing crisis, so you pay to build the workforce. But the crisis does not stop at the nursing home's front door. The same shortage lives in private homes — it is one workforce, moving between facilities, agencies, and families.

On the home side, that workforce runs on a completely different fuel. Live-in caregivers typically work rotations — two or three days straight in the home, then four days off — and the good ones are booked out weeks ahead. There is no loan-repayment offer recruiting them, no stipend retaining them, no pipeline building more of them. Families find them the way they have for decades: word of mouth, an agency if they can afford one, or luck.

When a family cannot find a caregiver, the story rarely makes the news. The daughter takes unpaid leave. The son sleeps on the couch between his own shifts. Or the senior ends up in the very facility this program is staffing — which is sometimes the right answer, but should be a choice, not a default set by an empty Rolodex.

Fund both sides of the door

None of this argues against the initiative. Nursing homes need nurses, and paying down their student debt to get them there is money pointed at a genuine problem.

It argues for remembering where senior care mostly happens. A country that funds the facility half of elder care while the home half runs on family savings and word of mouth has solved only the visible half of its shortage. The home half has a workforce too — experienced, in demand, and already holding the system up one household at a time. It would be nice, one of these years, to see a program with their name on it.

Until then, families will keep solving it themselves. It is why I built Only Livein: live-in caregiver jobs in one place, with the pay published up front, so a family can see what care actually costs and a caregiver can see what their work is worth — no program required.

Vincent Cruz is the founder of Only Livein (onlylivein.com) and a live-in caregiver in Los Angeles. The Pay Index figures cited here are published at onlylivein.com/pay.html and updated monthly.

More live-in guides and job pages

All articles — the Only Livein blog · Live-in caregiver pay in 2026 · Live-in home care: costs and hiring · California jobs · Pennsylvania jobs · Illinois jobs · New Jersey jobs · How live-in pay works · Rate check